<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.2-bleeding" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>cryptoresync</title>
	<link>http://cryptoresync.com</link>
	<description>A blog devoted to information system security, privacy and other similar topics</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 14:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2-bleeding</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>NSA Suit May Proceed</title>
		<link>http://cryptoresync.com/2006/07/21/nsa-suit-may-proceed/</link>
		<comments>http://cryptoresync.com/2006/07/21/nsa-suit-may-proceed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 10:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		
	<dc:subject>Lawsuits</dc:subject>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cryptoresync.com/2006/07/21/nsa-suit-may-proceed/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The federal judge overseeing the EFF -vs- AT&#038;T case regarding alleged complicity in widespread warrantless government surveillance has ruled that the case may proceed. This is a landmark decision, mainly because the U.S. government&#8217;s argument that the suit could reveal state secrets, a rarely used claim that nearly always terminates a lawsuit, was completely dismissed.
U.S. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The federal judge overseeing the <a href="http://www.eff.org/">EFF</a> -vs- AT&#038;T case regarding alleged complicity in widespread warrantless government surveillance has <a href="http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,71432-0.html?tw=rss.index">ruled that the case may proceed</a>. This is a landmark decision, mainly because the U.S. government&#8217;s argument that the suit could reveal state secrets, a rarely used claim that nearly always terminates a lawsuit, was completely dismissed.</p>
<blockquote><p>U.S. District Court Chief Judge Vaughn Walker found that the program was not a secret since &#8220;public disclosures by the government and AT&#038;T indicate that AT&#038;T is assisting the government to implement some kind of surveillance program.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Dismissing this case at the outset would sacrifice liberty for no apparent enhancement of security,&#8221; Walker wrote.</p></blockquote>
<p>This is extremely important because it allows the case to proceed, rather than merely being dismissed on the outset. That U.S. District Court Chief Judge Vaughn Walker was able to see through the rhetoric of the government lawyers speaks volumes. Though the war is far from being won, this small victory is extremely important as it allows the fighting to commence.</p>
<p>Every American should be keeping their eyes peeled to this case!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cryptoresync.com/2006/07/21/nsa-suit-may-proceed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MPAA Accused of Hiring Hacker</title>
		<link>http://cryptoresync.com/2006/05/25/mpaa-accused-of-hiring-hacker/</link>
		<comments>http://cryptoresync.com/2006/05/25/mpaa-accused-of-hiring-hacker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 10:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		
	<dc:subject>Lawsuits</dc:subject>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cryptoresync.com/2006/05/25/mpaa-accused-of-hiring-hacker/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an odd turn of events, TorrentSpy has accused the MPAA of hiring a hacker in order to obtain private documents that might be used against them in the lawsuit brought against them by the MPAA.
&#8220;We have very significant proof of wrongdoing and the MPAA&#8217;s involvement,&#8221; Rothken said. &#8220;We think it&#8217;s ironic for the MPAA [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an odd turn of events, TorrentSpy has <a href="http://news.com.com/2100-1030_3-6076665.html?part=rss&#038;tag=6076665&#038;subj=news">accused the MPAA of hiring a hacker</a> in order to obtain private documents that might be used against them in the lawsuit brought against them by the MPAA.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;We have very significant proof of wrongdoing and the MPAA&#8217;s involvement,&#8221; Rothken said. &#8220;We think it&#8217;s ironic for the MPAA to claim that they are protecting the rights of the movie studios and then go out and pirate other people&#8217;s property.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>It makes you really wonder how this was pulled off because I suspect that TorrentSpy does not have a true office environment. I have to ask what measures the TorrentSpy staff put in to place in order to secure the internal company network so that it is safe from the standard network attacks.</p>
<p>Because there is little information about the incident that lead to the suit I can only speculate that it was done mainly via social engineering as opposed to anything specifically technical in nature.  It will be interesting to watch how this case unfolds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cryptoresync.com/2006/05/25/mpaa-accused-of-hiring-hacker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
